|
| SECTION J - CASE MANAGEMENT OF INSOLVENT ENTERPRISES |
|
| J1. Administration of insolvency procedures generally: |
(a) In relation to each type of insolvency procedure available
in the legal system of this economy, what are the administrative
organs/entities involved in the implementation and management
of that procedure? (For example a trustee, liquidator, receiver,
government official.)
|
Scheme of arrangement
No administrative organ need be involved in the implementation
and management of a scheme of arrangement. It can and is often
done by the company itself with its specialist advisers. However,
in some cases usually on the creditors' insistence, a scheme may
provide for an independent scheme administrator to be appointed.
The powers and duties of the scheme administrator is determined
by the scheme document itself.
Receiver
The receiver is the only administrative organ involved in a receivership.
He is deemed to be the agent of the company; and this agency terminates
in so far as it is inconsistent with the purposes of a liquidation
if the company subsequently goes into liquidation.
Liquidation
The only administrative organs or entities involved in the implementation
and management of a liquidation is the liquidator himself and
the Official Receiver's office. The Official Receiver's office
is a government department which becomes by operation of law the
liquidator of any company in respect of which a private liquidator
is not appointed. Private liquidators are officers of the court
and are subject to the supervision of the Committee of Inspection
if one is appointed, the court and the Official Receiver's office.
Judicial management
A judicial manager is the only administrative entity involved
in a judicial management. He is not subject to the control of
the Official Receiver, but is subject to the control of the court
and the creditors.
|
|
(b) What qualifications must each type of administrator of
insolvency procedures possess? Is there a system of regulation
of insolvency administrators in this economy?
|
Judicial Manager
The nominee must be an approved company auditor. However, a
judicial manager appointed by the court or nominated by the Minister
need not be an approved company auditor. Save that the auditor
of the company cannot act as its judicial manager, there are no
other specific disqualifications mentioned in the Companies Act.
However, there are general provisions in the Companies Act prohibiting
certain classes of persons from participating, directly or indirectly,
in the management of companies. These provisions therefore apply
to judicial managers as well. Thus, the following persons may
not be appointed: (a) an undischarged bankrupt; (b) a person convicted
of offences in connection with the promotion, formation or management
of a company, or of offences involving fraud or dishonesty punishable
with imprisonment of three months or more, or of an offence under
enumerated sections of the Companies Act; and (c) a person in
persistent default in relation to delivery of documents to the
registrar of Companies.
Liquidator
In a winding up by the court, the liquidator is appointed by
the court. He must either be the Official Receiver or an approved
company auditor who has also been approved as a liquidator. Liquidators
are invariably accountants by profession. A person may not be
appointed as liquidator unless he has consented in writing to
the appointment. A liquidator may not consent to appointment if
he is subject to any of the following disqualifications: (a) he
owes more than S$2,500 to the company or its related corporations;
(b) he is an officer of the company or its related corporations;
(c) he is a partner, employer or employee of an officer of the
company or its related corporations; (d) he is an undischarged
bankrupt; and (e) he has been convicted of an offence involving
fraud or dishonesty punishable with imprisonment of three months
or more.
In a members' voluntary winding up, the liquidator need not be
an approved liquidator, nor do the disqualifications in sub-para
(b) and (c) above apply. Thus, in a members' voluntary winding
up, a director could be appointed the liquidator. The same relaxation
applies in a creditors' voluntary winding up if a resolution to
that effect has been passed by a majority of the creditors.
Receiver
A receiver cannot be: (a) a corporation; (b) an undischarged
bankrupt; (c) a mortgagee of any property of the company, an auditor
of the company or a director, secretary or employee of the company
or of any corporation which is a mortgagee of the property of
the company; (d) any person who is neither an approved liquidator
nor the Official Receiver.
|
|
(c) Are the creditors of a corporate debtor permitted to participate
in the administration of the relevant insolvency procedure, and
if so, how? (For example are the creditors permitted to assist
the administrator, or supervise or dictate the conduct of the
administration?)
|
Scheme of arrangement
Where a compromise or arrangement is proposed between a company
and its creditors or members or any class of them, the court may
order meetings of the creditors or of the members (or of the relevant
class of creditors or members) to be summoned.
At the meetings convened upon the order of court, the approval
of the members and creditors to the scheme of arrangement must
be obtained. A majority in numbers representing three-fourths
in value of the members or creditors is required to approve the
scheme.
Receivership
There is no formal role to be played by creditors in a receivership.
Liquidation
In a creditors' voluntary liquidation, the liquidator is chosen
by the creditors at the meeting convened in compliance with the
Act. In a compulsory winding up, the petitioning creditor nominates
the liquidator in his petition and this nomination is usually
acceded to by the Court.
Further, in a compulsory liquidation and in a creditors' voluntary
liquidation, the general body of creditors can compel the appointment
of a committee of inspection which then plays a supervisory role
under various provisions of the Companies Act. Under section 272,
the liquidator can with the consent of the committee of inspection
or the court carry on business for more than 4 weeks after the
making of the winding up order; can compromise claims by or against
the company and appoint solicitors to assist him in his duties.
Furthermore, the liquidator is under section 273 of the Companies
Act under a duty to have regard to the directions of the committee
of inspection in administering the assets of the company.
Further, any creditor may take part in the public examination
of an officer of a company in connection with which fraud has
been committed.
Judicial management
In a judicial management, the creditors also have a role to
play. Firstly, the creditors may oppose the nomination of a person
proposed as judicial manager by the petitioner. This may be done
by the majority in number and value of the creditors (including
contingent or prospective creditors).
Moreover, after the judicial manager has been appointed, the
creditors are entitled no more than 60 days thereafter (or such
longer period as the court may allow) to have laid before them
a statement of the judicial manager's proposals for the achievement
of the purposes for which the order was made.
Any revisions to the judicial manager's proposals accepted at
the first creditors' meeting must likewise be approved at a creditors'
meeting. Furthermore, the creditors may appoint a committee to
supervise the judicial manager. This committee cannot interfere
with the management of the company, but may require the judicial
manager to furnish it with such information as it may require.
Finally, under section 227R of the Companies Act, any creditor
can seek relief from the court if it is of the view that the judicial
manager is managing the affairs, business and property in a manner
which is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the creditors
or members generally, or some part of the creditors comprising
25% in value of the company's debts.
|
|
| J2. Powers of the administrator: |
(a) In relation to each type of insolvency procedure available
in the legal system of this economy, what are the powers given
to each type of administrator by statute, at general law or pursuant
to the terms of the appointment? (for example power to carry on
the business of the organization, to pay creditors, to compromise
claims of or against the debtor, to issue or defend legal proceedings,
to obtain credit, to sell property, to execute documents on behalf
of the debtor.)
|
Scheme of arrangement
There is no statutory administrator of a scheme of arrangement.
It is normally administerd by the company unless the scheme itself
provides for an independent scheme administrator to be appointed.
Receivership
A receiver and manager appointed under the terms of a debenture
usually has the widest powers of management and will be empowered
to carry on the business of the company with a view to selling
the company's undertaking as a going concern. He is under no duty
to pay creditors other than the debenture holders who appointed
him. He has the power to compromise, prosecute or defend any claims
by or against the company in the same way as the company itself
could have done. He can also sell the charged property and execute
documents in the name of the company for this purpose. This latter
power is usually pursuant to an express power of attorney in the
charge documents. Under Part VIII of the Act, he is under a duty
to lodge 6-monthly returns with the Registry of Companies showing
detailed accounts of his payments and receipts during the preceding
6 months.
Liquidation
The liquidator's job is to take into his custody or under his
control all the property or choses in action to which the company
is to appears to be entitled. The court may order any contributory,
trustee, receiver, agent or officer of the company to deliver
to the company any money, property or documents that he has in
his hands.
A liquidator has two sorts of powers: those that he may exercise
in his own discretion, and those that require the approval of
the court or the committee of inspection. The liquidator's discretionary
powers are to be found in section 272(2) of the Companies Acts.
In particular, a liquidator has the power to bring or defend any
action or other legal proceeding in the name and on behalf of
the company, to sell the property of the company, to appoint agents
to do any business which he is unable to do himself to do all
acts and execute in the name of the company all deeds, receipts
and other documents and for that purpose use the company's seal.
A liquidator is not obliged to prosecute or facilitate the prosecution
of any claim unless he believes that the claim has a reasonable
chance of succeeding or that it will serve some useful purpose,
nor is it his job to reopen transactions that have been carried
out in good faith by the company. A creditor or contributory who
is dissatisfied with the conduct of the liquidator may complain
to court, which can inquire into the matter. Some of the liquidator's
powers are exercisable only with the authority of the court or
of the committee of inspection. These are: (a) carrying on the
company's business so far as is necessary for the beneficial winding
up thereof for more than four weeks after the date of the winding
up order; (b) paying off any class of creditors in full, subject
to the statutory scheme of priorities; (c) making a compromise
or arrangement with the creditors; (d) compromising any debts
owed to the company by contributories or other debtors; and (e)
appointing a solicitor to assist him in his duties.
In a voluntary winding up, the liquidator may carry on the business
of the company in his own discretion, but only so far as is necessary
for the beneficial winding up thereof. The other powers set out
above may be exercised by the liquidator with the approval of
a special resolution of the company in a members' voluntary winding
up or with the approval of the court or the committee of inspection
in a creditors' voluntary winding up. The acts of a liquidator
are valid notwithstanding any defect that may subsequently be
found in his appointment or qualification.
Further, the liquidator has the power to disclaim land that is
burdened with onerous covenants, shares in corporations, unprofitable
contracts and any other property which is otherwise unsaleable
or not readily saleable by reason of requiring the possessor to
pay money or to perform some onerous act. This power may be exercised
only with the leave of the court or the committee of inspection,
which may be granted subject to conditions.
The power of disclaimer cannot be exercised to allow the company
to get out of a contract merely because it would be better in
the liquidator's view not to have to perform the contract. In
deciding whether or not to grant leave to the liquidator, the
court will take into consideration the effect of the disclaimer
on parties interested in the liquidation. The benefit to the unsecured
creditors will be weighed against the possible injury to persons
who are interested in the property.
The liquidator has power to recover property of the company which
has been improperly dissipated before winding up.
Where a company has either bought property from or sold property
to a person who was at the time of the transaction a director
of the company for cash consideration and the transaction occurred
within two years before the commencement of the winding up, the
company may recover any amount by which the property was overvalued
or undervalued (as the case may be) from the director. This also
applies to transactions with another company where that company
had common directors with the company in liquidation. The liability
to account seems to be strict, and there is no provision allowing
the members to approve such a transaction. Similarly, if a director
entered into a transaction with the company to buy or sell non-cash
assets worth more than S$100,000.00 without the approval of the
general meeting, the liquidator presumably could exercise the
company's right to rescind the transaction. There is no time limit
prescribed for this latter right of rescission, but the longer
the liquidator defers rescission, the less likely it is that rescission
will be allowed.
If the promoters or officers of the company have breached their
duties towards the company, the liquidator may apply to court
to have these duties enforced in a summary way. Section 341 allows
the court to assess damages against delinquent promoters and officers
summarily by means of a misfeasance summons.
In addition to bringing a misfeasance summons, the liquidator
may also apply to court to make any person who was party to carrying
on the company's business in a fraudulent manner liable for the
company's debts. Where an officer has authorized the contracting
of a debt when he had no reasonable and probable expectation of
the debt being repaid, the liquidator may apply to make him liable
to pay that debt.
Judicial management
When a judicial manager is appointed, he has to send to the Registrar,
the members and the creditors of the company a statement of his
proposals for the achievement of the purposes for which the order
was made.
Where the judicial manager's proposals have been approved, he
must manage the company in accordance with those proposals. He
may revise the proposals from time to time, but only if those
revisions are approved at a creditors' meeting.
In order to enable the judicial manager to carry out his duties,
the directors of the company and the secretary must submit a statement
of affairs to him within 21 days of receiving notice that the
judicial management order has been made. The judicial manager
may require verification of the statement of affairs by former
officers of the company, the company's employees and promoters
of the company (if the company was formed within a year prior
to the making of the order). Officers (including former officers),
employees and promoters of the company are obliged to give the
judicial manager such information as he may reasonably require.
The court may summon any officer of the company or any other
person who is suspected of having the company's property in his
possession, or who is suspected of being indebted to the company,
or whom the court thinks can provide information, to appear before
it and require him to submit an affidavit containing an account
of his dealings with the company. The court may also require such
a person to produce any books, papers or other records under his
control. The court's power to order such inquiries in dealings
with the company may be exercised on the application of the judicial
manager.
|
|
(b) To what extent and in what circumstances may each type
of insolvency administrator seek assistance, advice or direction
in the conduct of the administration, and from what sources? (for
example the Court, his appointor, the creditors of the debtor,
a solicitor, accountant or other relevant person.)
|
Scheme of arrangement
There is no statutory provision for an administrator under section
210, so there are no provisions for the administrator to have
guidance. However, it is always possible to apply to the Court
for guidance under the general law.
Receivership
A receiver or a receiver and manager will usually engage solicitors
to guide him in legal matters. If necessary, a receiver has the
power under section 218(3) to apply at any time to the Court for
directions in relation to any matter arising in connection with
the performance of the functions of a receiver or manager.
The receiver must be careful, however, in taking directions from
the debenture holder. The terms of a debenture invariably deem
the receiver to be the agent of the company. However, if the debenture
holder has so interfered in the receivership by giving directions
etc as to constitute the receiver the agent of the debenture holder,
the debenture holder may be held liable for any negligence or
misfeasance by the receiver.
Liquidator
A liquidator can seek guidance from the committee of inspection
appointed under section 277 of the Companies Act. Further, a liquidator
is empowered to engage solicitors. In the final resort, a liquidator
can seek directions from the court under section 273(3) of the
Companies Act in the case of a compulsory liquidation or under
section 310(1) of the Companies Act in the case of a voluntary
winding up.
Judicial Manager
A judicial manager will normally engage solicitors and other
professional advisers and if necessary is empowered to apply to
court for directions in relation to any matter arising in connection
with the performance of his functions under section 227G(5) of
the Companies Act.
|
|
| J3. Duties of the administrator: |
(a) In relation to each type of insolvency procedure available
in the legal system of this economy, what are the duties imposed
upon each type of administrator by statute and at general law?
(for example a duty to take possession of assets of the debtor,
to realise those assets, to discharge the debt owed to his appointor,
to call for proofs of debts owed to creditors, to adjudicate upon
claims of creditors, to apply available assets in discharge of
those claims, to report on the conduct of the debtor by the proprietors.)
|
Scheme of arrangement
There are no specific duties imposed on the person administering
a scheme of arrangement. The obligations will be set out in the
scheme document itself.
Receiver
A receiver or a receiver and manager is invariably deemed by
the debenture to be an agent of the company and not of the debenture
holder. However, his primary duty is to realise the assets of
the company and discharge the debt due to the debenture holder.
He owes only a duty of good faith in equity, and not one of reasonable
care at common law, to the company. The only exception appears
to be that if the receiver decides to sell the charged property,
he owes a duty of care in negligence to take reasonable steps
to ensure that he receives the fair value for the property at
the time of sale.
Liquidator
Under section 269(1), a liquidator is under a duty to take into
his custody or under his control all the property and things in
action to which the company appears to be entitled. After receiving
the statement of affairs from the managers of the company, the
liquidator is under a duty under section 271(1) of the Companies
Act to submit a preliminary report to the court or the Official
Receiver as to the causes of the company's failure and whether
further inquiry is desirable. The liquidator is under a duty to
use his own discretion in the management of the affairs and property
of the company and the distribution of its assets, subject to
his obligation to have regard to the directions of the creditors
or contributories or the court. When the liquidator has realised
all the property of the company and has distributed a final dividend,
he is empowered to apply to court for his release.
Judicial manager
A judicial manager is under a duty to take into his custody
or under his control all property to which the company is or appears
to be entitled. During the currency of a juidicial management
order, a judicial manager is obliged to manage the company in
accordance with the proposals approved by the creditors at a meeting
convened for that purpose.
|
|
| J4. Breach of duty and liability of administrators: |
(a) What remedies and/or sanctions are available in the legal
system of this economy in respect of breaches of duty or transgressions
committed by each type of insolvency administrator?
|
Scheme of arrangement
There are no statutory remedies or sanctions in respect of breaches
of duty or transgressions committed by those administering a scheme
of arrangement. The scheme administrator would have common law
liability for negligence, fraud or misconduct.
Receiver
A receiver or a receiver and manager who has misapplied or retained
or become liable or accountable for any money or property of the
company or been guilty of any misfeasance or breach of trust or
duty in relation to the company can be compelled by the court
to compensate the company as the court thinks just.
Liquidator
A liquidator is obliged under section 274 of the Companies Act
to pay money received by him into such bank account as is prescribed
by the Companies (Winding Up) Rules or as is specified by the
court failing which he his guilty of a criminal offence. Any liquidator
who retains for more than 10 days a sum exceeding $1,000 or such
other amount as the court in any particular case authorises him
to retain is liable to pay interest on that sum at rate of 20%
per annum and is in addition liable to have all or part of his
remuneration disallowed, to be removed from office and to pay
any expenses occasioned by reason of his default. A private liquidator
is subject to the control of the Official Receiver.
A liquidator, whether appointed by the court or in a voluntary
winding up, may be removed by the court on cause shown. Cause
may be shown when there is some unfitness of the person by reason
of his personal character, or from his connection with other parties,
or from the circumstances in which he is mixed up. Thus, for instance,
if a liquidator refuses to take action against miscreant directors
because he is one of them or because they are his friends, he
may be removed by the court. Similarly, if the liquidator is not
independent or impartial because of his connection with persons
against whom there might be pending claims, there would be cause
to have him removed. Where it appears that the liquidator is in
a position where his duty and interest conflict, the court may
remove him.
An action against a liquidator for breach of duty can also be
brought under Section 341 of the Companies Act. Under Section
341, the court may compel the liquidator to repay or restore any
money/property of the company which he has misapplied.
Judicial manage
r A judicial manager may at any time be removed from office by
order of the court. There are no express provisions giving any
party a right of action against a judicial manager for misfeasance
or misconduct in office. However, if he has been guilty of such
acts, he is unlikely to obtain his release from liability to the
company from the court under section 227J(4) or section 227Q(4)
of the Companies Act. The company, acting by its liquidator if
necessary, will then be free to take action against the judicial
manager under the general law.
|
|
(b) Have there been actual instances of breach of duty or
transgressions committed by insolvency administrators?
|
There have been no reported instances.
|
|
(c) If so, give the details of any major cases and a summary
of the action taken and the results.
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|