SECTION G - ATTITUDES TOWARD FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY AND INSOLVENCY.
[In this part we seek to discover underlying attitudes to debt; financial difficulty; and insolvency as it affects both corporate borrowers and lenders. The response to this section may, therefore, be expected to be founded on general impressions.]
G1. From the position of a corporate borrower.

(a) If a corporate debtor is in financial difficulty, is there an attitude of 'concealment' or 'denial' toward the admission or exposure of that financial difficulty?

Yes.
 

(b) If so, is the reason for this based on cultural or other factors?

The reason is both cultural and economic reasons.
 

(c) Is it likely that a corporate debtor would:

(i) volunteer the fact of its financial difficulty to a lender or group of lenders; or

(ii) admit or concede it only if and when confronted by a lender or group of lenders?

Probably likely to disclose its financial difficulty when confronted by the lenders.

 

(d) If a corporate debtor is in financial difficulty, is it likely that the corporate debtor would:

(i) do nothing;

(ii) seek expert assistance and advice; or

(iii) accept the appointment by a lender of an outside expert/advisor?

Seek expert assistance or advice.

 

(e) If it was agreed between a lender and a corporate debtor that an expert/advisor would be appointed, is it likely that a corporate debtor would give the expert/advisor unrestricted access to all relevant financial and other information regarding the corporate debtor?

Most likely.
 

(f) In that situation, is it likely that the financial and other information regarding the corporate borrower would be:

(i) complete; and

(ii) accurate (particularly regarding the valuation of assets and the assessment of liabilities)?

Satisfactorily complete and accurate but may not be completely complete or accurate.

G2. From the position of lenders.

(a) Is it more common that the financial difficulty of a corporate borrower will be:

(i) volunteered by a corporate debtor; or

(ii) discovered by a lender (and, if so, how)?

Probably by the lender from its own investigation.

 

(b) If a lender becomes aware that a corporate debtor is in financial difficulty, is it likely that the lender would seek to investigate the financial crisis of the corporate debtor itself and employ an expert/advisor to investigate the financial position?

Most likely investigate on its own in the beginning and seek outside advise at a later time if necessary.

 

(c) If so, is the expert/advisor likely to be:

(i) an independent professional; or

(ii) an 'in-house' employee of the lender?

Most likely an outside professional.

 

(d) Is it likely that information regarding the financial position of a corporate borrower as discovered from the work of an expert/advisor would be:

(i) kept secret from other lender/s or creditors;

(ii) disclosed to other/selected lenders?

Disclosed to other selected lenders.

 

(e) If there were 2 or more lenders (not in a syndicate) involved with the same corporate borrower, is it likely that they would:

(i) join together to share information and endeavour to work out a common approach to the financial problems of the corporate borrower; or

(ii) act secretly and independently of one another?

Work together.

 

(f) If there was a group of lenders (whether in a syndicate or not) involved with the same corporate borrower, is it likely that one of them would offer or seek to be the leader on behalf of them all?

Yes.

 

(g) If so, is it likely that such a proposal would be agreed to by the other lenders?

Yes, after negotiations.

 

(h) Is it likely that local lenders would have employees who are experienced in informal work outs?

No.

 

(i) If there was foreign bank lending involved, is it likely that domestic lenders would:

(i) combine with; or

(ii) act independently of the foreign lender/s?

Work together.

 

(j) Is it likely that 'junior' or 'minor' lenders might seek to trade their debt?

No.