|
| SECTION S - ASSESSMENT OF PROCESSES |
| S1. Is the process for taking of security over land to secure
corporate borrowing: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
X |
| * Very expensive |
|
|
| Easy |
X |
| Difficult |
|
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
|
| S2. Is the process for taking of security over property other
than land to secure corporate borrowing: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
X |
| * Very expensive |
|
|
| Easy |
X |
| Difficult |
|
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
The norm here was a floating charge. The answers would be quite
different, for example, if the security were airplanes
|
| S3. Is the process for enforcement of security over land: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
X |
| * Very expensive |
|
|
| Easy |
X |
| Difficult |
|
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
Some answers hedged, because of the different types of procedures.
|
| S4. Is the process for enforcement of security over property
other than land: |
| Not expensive |
X |
| Expensive |
|
| * Very expensive |
|
|
| Easy |
X |
| Difficult |
|
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
Answers were inconsistent, likely because it was not clear whether
or not court intervention was being sought.
|
| S5. Is the process for debt collection: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
X |
| * Very expensive |
|
|
| Easy |
|
| Difficult |
X |
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
High legal costs.
|
| S6. Is the process for winding up (liquidating) an insolvent
corporate borrower: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
|
| * Very expensive |
X |
|
| Easy |
|
| Difficult |
X |
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
X |
| * Inefficient |
|
|
|
High accountancy and legal costs.
|
| S7. Is the process for the possible re-structuring of an insolvent
corporate borrower: |
| Not expensive |
|
| Expensive |
|
| * Very expensive |
X |
|
| Easy |
|
| Difficult |
X |
| * Very difficult |
|
|
|
| Very efficient |
|
| Efficient |
|
| * Inefficient |
X |
|
|
There does not exist at present an effective mechanism for restructuring
companies in Hong Kong, China. Section 166 is rarely used, The main option
is an informal workout, which can prove cumbersome and expensive.
|
| S8. What is the average time period between the filing of an
application for the winding up (liquidation or bankruptcy) of an insolvent
corporate borrower and the formal pronouncement that the corporate
borrower will be liquidated: |
| 1-2 Months |
X |
| 2-4 Months |
|
| 4-6 Months |
|
| * Other |
|
*Specify time period and give brief reasons
Interestingly, the answers ranged over the first three boxes, but
the correct answer is that the average time at present is 6 weeks.
|
|
| S9. What is the average time period for the commencement of
a formal procedure for the re-organisation or re-structure (including
a composition) of an insolvent corporate borrower and the commencement
of the implementation of an agreed formal plan of re-organisation
or re-structure: |
| 2-4 Months |
|
| 4-6 Months |
|
| 8-12 Months |
|
| * 12-18 Months |
X |
| * Other |
|
*Specify time period and give brief reasons
Very few cases.
|
|
| S10. What is the average time period for the commencement of
an informal procedure (a "work out") for the re-organisation or re-structure
(including a composition) of an insolvent corporate borrower and the
commencement of the implementation of an agreed plan of re-organisation
or re-structure: |
| 2-4 Months |
|
| 4-6 Months |
|
| 8-12 Months |
|
| * 12-18 Months |
X |
| * Other |
X |
*Specify time period and give brief reasons
One banker noted that by the time two years has passed most of
the banks have lost interest - thus many workouts seem to get agreed
upon from 18-24 months.
|
|
| S11. If there are relevant statistics available for the incidence
of formal insolvency procedures for insolvent corporate borrowers
do these show that the incidence for (a) liquidation/bankruptcy and
(b) re-organisation/re-structure is: |
| Very high |
|
| High |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
X |
|
| Very high |
|
| High |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
X |
|
Interestingly, there was some range in the answers for (a), but
it is quite clear from the data that the rate of liquidation in
Hong Kong, China is quite low. The rate of reorganization is even less.
|
|
| S12. What is your assessment of the predictability (positive,
certain outcome) of the following processes in your economy: |
(a) Security enforcement of land
|
| Very high |
X |
| High |
|
| Medium |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
(b) Security enforcement of property other than land
|
| Very high |
|
| High |
X |
| Medium |
X |
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
(c) Judicial handling of security enforcement
|
| Very high |
X |
| High |
|
| Medium |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
(d) Judicial handling of debt collection
|
| Very high |
|
| High |
X |
| Medium |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
(e) Judicial handling of insolvency (liquidation) cases
|
| Very high |
|
| High |
X |
| Medium |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
(f) Judicial handling of cases of re-organisation/re-structure
|
| Very high |
|
| High |
X |
| Medium |
|
| Low |
|
| * Very low |
|
|
|
|